Time to first result
Install with one command and you'll have [first working result] running against your own [repo/project/stack] in a few minutes.
Where engineers find new tools, what to say to them, and which channels to skip.
Trusted by teams at
Start with docs and a quickstart that gets a developer to a working result before they lose interest, because that is your real landing page. Then write comparison and how-to pages that answer the exact problems your tool solves, so you show up on Google and in AI answers. Show up where engineers already talk, like Hacker News, relevant subreddits and GitHub. Once usage starts, find the companies whose engineers signed up and reach the engineering lead who can buy a team plan.
Write a quickstart that gets a developer from install to a real result on their own project with as few steps as possible. Put a copyable install command above the fold on your homepage. Test it yourself on a clean machine and with a friend who has never seen the product. Every confusing step you remove is worth more than any ad.
List 20 problems your tool solves, phrased the way engineers type them, including error messages and "how to [task] in [framework]". Add honest comparison pages for each competitor and "[competitor] alternative" pages. Include real code in every page. These rank on Google and are the pages AI answers tend to quote.
Post a Show HN with a plain title, a live demo or one-command install, and a short note on why you built it. Stay in the thread and answer every technical question. Share the same story in the two or three subreddits and Discords where your users already hang out, following each community's self-promotion rules.
Publish open source pieces around your product: an SDK, a CLI, a GitHub Action, starter templates for popular frameworks. Write READMEs that explain the problem first and the tool second. Answer issues quickly, because people read your issue tracker to decide if you're alive.
Group your sign-ups by email domain to see which companies have several engineers using the tool. Find the engineering manager or platform lead at those companies on LinkedIn. Write to them about what their team is already doing with your tool and what a team plan adds, like SSO, shared config or usage reports. Keep it short and offer a call only if they want one.
Run Google and Microsoft search ads only on competitor, alternative and specific problem terms. Send each ad to the matching comparison or how-to page, not your homepage. Track installs or first successful runs, not just sign-ups. Cut any keyword that brings visitors who never install.
Individual developers adopt the tool for free or on a personal plan. An engineering manager, platform lead or CTO approves the paid team or enterprise plan, often after security review.
They want something that fixes an annoying problem today and works with their stack without a sales call. A broken build, a slow test suite or a tool they hate at work pushes them to search.
They care about team velocity, fewer incidents and not adding another tool nobody maintains. They buy when several engineers are already using your free tier and ask for seats.
They own CI, observability, internal tooling and cloud spend, and they standardize what everyone else uses. A migration, a cost spike or an outage usually triggers the search.
They pick tools themselves and move fast. They want sensible defaults, fair pricing and a product that will scale with them without a rewrite.
They don't choose the tool but they can block it. They ask about SOC 2, SSO, data residency and where your code or logs end up.
Install with one command and you'll have [first working result] running against your own [repo/project/stack] in a few minutes.
If you're still [painful current workflow, e.g. writing YAML by hand for every service], [tool] does it from [the config you already have].
We built [tool] because [incumbent] was [specific gap]. Here's where we're better, and the cases where you should stick with [incumbent].
[Number] engineers at [company] are already using [tool] on personal accounts. A team plan gives you [SSO/shared config/usage visibility] so it's not shadow IT.
Lead generation
For a developer tool, a lead is usually a company, not a person. Individual engineers come to you through docs, GitHub and community posts. Your job is to notice when a company crosses the line from one curious engineer to a team habit. Group sign-ups by work email domain and watch for several active users at the same company, repeated use in CI, or questions about SSO and seats. Those are the accounts worth a human conversation. Skip buying lists of "developers" to email, because nobody on that list asked for anything. A concrete example: if four engineers at a mid-size fintech are running your test tool in their pipelines, find the platform lead there and tell them what their team is already doing and what a team plan would give them. That message is useful. A blind pitch to a stranger is not.
Cold email
Cold email to individual developers is a bad bet. They want to try a tool, read the docs and decide alone, and an unsolicited pitch makes your brand look like the vendors they avoid. Cold email works when you write to an engineering manager, platform lead or CTO with a reason that is about them. Good reasons include their engineers already using your free tier, a public repo that uses a competitor you replace, or a job post for a role your tool makes easier. Keep it to a few lines, written like one engineer to another, with no buzzwords. Link to a quickstart or a short demo instead of asking for a meeting. For example: "Saw your team is hiring two SREs to own alerting. We built [tool] to cut alert noise for teams on [stack]. Here's a five-line setup if you want to try it."
Advertising
Ads for developer tools work best when they meet an engineer in the middle of a search. Google and Microsoft search ads on terms like "[competitor] alternative", "[competitor] pricing" or a specific problem phrase bring people who are already shopping. Broad terms like "developer tools" or "API platform" burn money. Reddit ads in technical subreddits can work if the ad reads like a useful post, with a code snippet or a real benchmark you can show, not a slogan. X ads suit tools with an active developer audience there. LinkedIn ads are for reaching engineering managers and platform leads about team plans, not for winning individual developers. Skip Facebook, Instagram and TikTok for this. One example: a search ad for "self-hosted feature flags" that links straight to a page with a Docker install command is far more likely to bring installs than a homepage ad.
An individual developer usually finds the tool, tries it on a side project or one service, and keeps using it if it works. The paid decision comes later, when a manager or platform lead sees several engineers relying on it and needs seats, SSO or support, and security may review it first. A fast free path, clear docs, and a ready security page with SOC 2 status, data handling and SSO details speed it up.
We make Driftcheck, a CLI that catches Terraform drift before deploys. Free for individuals, paid team plan with SSO. Find platform and DevOps leads at Series A to C SaaS companies running Terraform, and get us ranking for drift detection searches.
Early on, usually not a dedicated one. Let developers adopt the tool on their own through a free tier or trial. Add sales conversations when companies have several active users and start asking about SSO, invoices, security reviews or support. At that point a founder or one technical seller talking to engineering leads makes sense.
Hacker News is usually the better fit because the audience is engineers who will actually install and test your tool. Product Hunt can help with general awareness and backlinks but brings more makers and marketers than working developers. If you do both, prepare a live demo and stay in the comments all day.
Lead with the problem and real code, not adjectives. Say what the tool does, what it doesn't do, and when a competitor is the better choice. Show a working install command, honest limits and a public changelog. Developers forgive a plain website far more easily than vague claims.
Open sourcing the core or useful pieces like the SDK, CLI or integrations helps engineers find and trust you on GitHub. It also lets them check how you handle their code and data. Many dev tool companies keep team features like SSO, audit logs and hosted infrastructure paid. Decide based on whether openness helps adoption more than it helps competitors copy you.
Expect questions about SSO, role-based access, data retention, where data is stored and your SOC 2 status. Publish a security page that answers these plainly, including what you don't have yet. Have a standard DPA and a short security questionnaire response ready so procurement doesn't stall a deal your users already want.
Plans start at $99 a month, and Revnu starts on what you typed as soon as you sign up. Cancel any time in Settings.
No. Nothing is checked or generated on this page. Revnu does the work inside your account, where it can read your website, keep what it finds and carry on from there.
Last updated October 14, 2026